To think outside the box usually suggests unbinding one’s self from the obvious premise given, which then enables you to get a different angle, perhaps a bigger picture to solve a given problem.
     But to think that there’s even a box, strangely there, for you to examine, shows that you’re still working on a premise, which may be untrue or inexistent in the first place.
     To you believe that something is a fact, without even knowing where it came from is like finding truths in a book whose said author may not even exist.
    More so, to see grown, honored (apparently infallible) men dispute over the meaning of passage of a scrupulous book is pathetic.